JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 3, 1994

A- de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Petra Ronner Porst

✓
Topic · hard data
Negativa De Nulidad De La Sent. T-341/94. Valoracion De Pruebas. Fraude Procesal.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se decretó la nulidad de la Sentencia T-341/94, lo anterior, porque la Corte explicó que solamente podrá prosperar la nulidad cuando se vulnere un principio procesal establecido en la Constitución.

En este caso, la violación al debido proceso debe darse dentro de la sentencia, no antes, porque ello implicaría una revisión a la revisión y, aun habiéndose dictado el fallo hay que evitar que en la práctica, se convierta la nulidad en una tutela a la sentencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. NO DECRETAR LA NULIDAD de la sentencia T-341 de julio 27 de 1994.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR, a través de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido completo de este auto, a la peticionaria y a la Empresa Aerovías Nacionales de Colombia S.A. -AVIANCA-.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.