JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 25, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Stella Rojas Urrego

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Los Autos De Noviembre 10 Y 24 De 2004, Proferidos Por El Magistrado Sustanciador Doctor Jaime Cordoba Triviño, De Inadmision Y Rechazo De La Demanda. Niega El Desistimiento Presentado Por La Accionante Y Confirma Los Autos Recurridos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Falta de certeza en razones de inconstitucionalidad
  • Requisitos mínimos
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • No constituye herramienta para adicionar razones de inconstitucionalidad
Accion De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia de desistimiento
Remate De Bienes En Proceso Civil
  • Solicitud al juez laboral o fiscal de liquidación definitiva, crédito y costas
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR el desistimiento presentado por la accionante, senora Stella Rojas Urrego a los recursos de suplica interpuestos los dias 16 y 30 de noviembre de 2004.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad los Autos de noviembre 10 y 24 de 2004, proferidos por el Magistrado Sustanciador Jaime Cordoba Trivino, mediante los cuales se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por la ciudadana Stella Rojas Urrego.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.