Dissenting and concurring opinions by Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Decisions in which Gabriel filed a dissenting or concurring opinion. 476 in total.
The record of separate opinions is reliable from ~2000. Earlier dissents may be incomplete in the data.
T-701/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-688/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-647/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Procedencia Por Defecto Factico Por Omision En Valoracion De Pruebas En Proceso De Reparacion.
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-640/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-597/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-574/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-565/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-563/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-558/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-533/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-531/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-530/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-453/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-448/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-435/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-302/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-246/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-212/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-148/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-115/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-078/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-075/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-020/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
SU.949/14Unification2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
SU.774/14Unification2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →