JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 23, 2005

T-978 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ligia Santacruz De Gomez Vs. Cajanal

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a gozar de manera integral oportuna y efectiva de la pension reconocida en conexidad con el derecho al minimo vital de afiliada a quien no obstante haberle sido rconocida la pension no ha sido incluida en nomina de pensionados.

No satisface el derecho al pago integral oportuno y efectivo de las mesadas pensionales el mero reconocimiento sino que es necesaria la inclusión en nomina.

Procedencia de la accion de tutela.

Concedida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Laboral del Circuito de Bogotá en cuanto negó el amparo solicitado por la señora Ligia Santacruz de Gómez.
  3. Segundo. TUTELAR el derecho de la actora a gozar de manera integral, oportuna y efectiva de la pensión reconocida, en conexidad con el derecho al mínimo vital y ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que adopte las medidas necesarias para que incluya en nómina la pensión del actor, si aún no lo ha hecho, dentro de las 48 horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.