JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 17, 2000

T-905 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Eugenia Taborda Saldarriaga

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Violacion Cuando La Comunicacion No Es Oportuna. Reconocimiento Pension De Sobreviviente. Iss. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Término para resolver
  • Resolución oportuna y exacta
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Trece Laboral del Circuito de Medellin. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de peticion de la senora Maria Eugenia Taborda Saldarriaga.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales de Medellin, para que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, de efectiva respuesta a la peticion de la demandante.
  3. Tercero. PREVENIR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales para que en el futuro evite un manejo inadecuado de las peticiones de los ciudadanos.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaria General, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.