JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 24, 2002

T-894 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jorge Ivan Henao Morales Vs. Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito De Yolombo Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Libertad. Solicitud Libertad Condicional. Aplicacion De La Ley Permisiva O Favorable. Dosificacion De La Pena. Subrogados Penales. Favorabilidad. Reconsideracion Del Juez. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Libertad Condicional
  • Diferencias entre el antiguo y nuevo código relativas a su concesión
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para reemplazar recursos no utilizados
Principio De Favorabilidad Penal
  • Aplicación
  • Aplicación de norma del nuevo Código Penal sobre libertad condicional
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Familia del H. Tribunal Superior de Antioquia el 30 de mayo de 2002, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por Jorge Ivan Henao Morales contra el Juez Promiscuo del Municipio de Yolombo, el 30 de mayo de 2002, pero por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. INSTAR al Juez accionado para que estudie nuevamente la solicitud de libertad condicional del actor, sin que para el efecto se requiera una nueva solicitud del afectado.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1.991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.