JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 11, 2000

T-872 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Juan Alejandro Sarmiento Garzon

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida. Vigilante Despedido En Incapacidad. Contrato A Termino Fijo Que No Fue Prorrogado. Conjunto Residencial Torres Blancas. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguro Social
  • Pronunciamiento sobre reconocimiento de pensión de invalidez
Contrato De Trabajo A Termino Fijo
  • Terminación por vencimiento del plazo acordado
Empleador
  • Conducta éticamente reprochable no es ilegal o inconstitucional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 44 Penal Municipal de Santafe de Bogota, el dia 23 de diciembre de 1999, mediante el cual se denego la solicitud de tutela presentada por el senor Juan Alejandro Sarmiento Garzon.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que se de traslado al Instituto de los Seguros Sociales - Pensiones - del expediente y la sentencia, para que se pronuncie sobre el derecho del actor - el senor Juan Alejandro Sarmiento Garzon, identificado con cedula de ciudadania No 79.655.488 de Santa fe de Bogota, D.C. - a recibir una pension de invalidez.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.