JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 12, 2007

T-850 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Alcira Becerra Prada Vs. Juzgado 8º Civil Municipal De Bucaramanga Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ley 3 De 1991
  • Créditos de vivienda de interés social se podían denominar en UPAC
  • Antecedentes
  • Objetivo
Debido Proceso
  • No vulneración por cuanto no se hizo uso de las herramientas procesales
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida el debido proceso la vivienda digna y a la propiedad privada de deudora de entidad creditica contra quien se adelanta proceso ejecutivo hipotecario siendo ordenada la diligencia de remate.credito de vivienda de interes social.

Inexistencia de via de hecho.

En el presente caso la actora tiene a su alcance otro mecanismo de defensa judicial.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Bucaramanga, Sala Civil, de fecha 8 de marzo de 2007, que a su turno confirmo la dictada el 13 de febrero de 2007 por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga, denegando la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Alcira Becerra Prada en contra del Juzgado 8deg Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga y el Banco Granahorrar hoy BBVA.
  3. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.