JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 9, 2001

T-843 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Arceli Amargarita Ripoll Ripio Vs Iss Atlántico.·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud Y Dignidad Humana. Solicitud De Examenes Y Tratamiento De Vision. Prestación Oportuna De Servicio Medico. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Cirugía ocular por el ISS
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla el diecisiete (17) de enero de dos mil uno (2001), y en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela incoada por la señora Arcelia Margarita Ripoll Ripoll.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Clínica de los Andes del Instituto de Seguros Sociales -Seccional Atlántico-, que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes contadas a partir de la notificación de esta providencia, realice a la señora Arcelia Margarita Ripoll Ripoll la valoración ordenada, y disponga de todas las acciones necesarias para proteger sus derechos a la vida, a la salud y a la dignidad humana.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.