JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1995

T-615A de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Felicita Bono F.(Hna Elisiana)

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Reconocimiento Y Pago De La Pension Gracia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Contenido de la decisión
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR en todas sus partes el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá el 4 de septiembre de 1995, dentro de la acción de tutela de la referencia.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela solicitada y en consecuencia, ordenar al Director de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que, si todavía no lo ha hecho, resuelva u ordene a quien corresponda resolver, en el improrrogable término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de la sentencia, la petición de reconocimiento y pago de la pensión gracia presentada ante esa entidad por Felicita Bono M., el día 15 de noviembre de 1994.
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.