JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1995

T-612 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Maria A. Ruiz Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Pago De Mesada Adicional Para Pension De Invalidez Parcial. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reconocimiento y pago de mesadas adicionales
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia sobre interpretaciones legales
Pension Parcial De Invalidez
  • Pago de mesada adicional
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo de fecha 14 de agosto de 1995, proferido por el Juzgado Cuarenta y dos Penal Municipal de Medellín, mediante el cual se negó la acción de tutela impetrada por los ciudadanos JAIME DE JESUS MONTAÑO CANO, MARIA AURA LINA RUIZ ZAPATA, ORLANDO DE JESUS OSORIO MONTOYA, RAFAEL GENARO GALVIS, OMAR DARIO VELEZ USME, WILLIAM DE JESUS LONDOÑO TIRADO y LUIS CONRADO VELEZ HURTADO, contra el Instituto de los Seguros Sociales, Seccional Antioquia, por las razones aquí expuestas.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRENSE, por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.