JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 7, 2001

T-602 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Fidel Antonio Calero Campuzano Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Los Organismos Estatales Y Particulares Tienen 15 Dias Para Resolver El Derecho.La Obligacion Del Funcionario U Organismo Sobre La Oportuna Resolucion De Las Peticiones Formuladas No Se Satisface Con El Silencio Administrativo. Conced
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo dictado por el Juzgado
  2. Séptimo. Civil del Circuito de Cali, Valle, de 24 de julio de 2000, a través del cual negó la tutela formulada. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de petición al accionante FIDEL ANTONIO CALERO CAMPUZANO.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR, en consecuencia, al Instituto al Instituto de Seguro Social, Seccional Valle del Cauca, que dentro del perentorio término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente sentencia, si no lo hubiere hecho, responda la petición formulada por el señor FIDEL ANTONIO CALERO CAMPUZANO en escrito entregado en esa Seccional el día 3 de octubre de 2000.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se dé cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.