JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 9, 1993

T-573 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Luis Edilson Marin Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Autonomia Universitaria. Reglamento Estudiantil. Proyecto De Investigacion Como Trabajo De Grado. Negado.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Confirmar la decisión del H. Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá -Sala Civil-, de junio 22 de 1993, que confirma la decisión de primera instancia en el asunto de la referencia, en consideración al reconocimiento de la autonomía universitaria que hace la Constitución Política.
  4. Segundo. Oficiar al Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior ICFES, para que, en la órbita de su competencia, adelante las investigaciones que sobre posibles faltas se hayan cometido con ocasión de los hechos motivo de la presente acción.
  5. Tercero. Notifíquese la presente resolución al Juzgado Veinte (20) Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá para los efectos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.