JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 13, 1998

T-570 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Eda Judith Mendoza Castillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Retraso En El Pago De La Mesada Pensional. No Existe Vulneracion De Ders. Fundamentales. Tutela Temeraria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No es válido ordenar a particulares desobedecer providencia judicial en firme
  • Verificación supuestos de hecho
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedimiento preferente y sumario
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR en su totalidad el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal Municipal de Cartagena el 4 de marzo de 1998 y, en su lugar, negar por improcedente la tutela solicitada por Eda Judith Mendoza Castillo.
  3. Segundo. CONDENAR en costas a la actora, Eda Judith Mendoza Castillo, por la temeridad en que incurrio al demandar judicialmente el pago de una mesada pensional que ya le habia sido cancelada.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que remita copia del presente expediente a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion par las averiguaciones de su competencia.
  5. Cuarto. Ordenar a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que proceda a notificar a las partes en este proceso lo decidido en via de revision, y a remitir el expediente, antes de que regrese al Despacho de origen, al Consejo Seccional de Bolivar, para que adelante la averiguacion disciplinaria del caso.
  6. Quinto. Comunicar finalmente esta providencia al Juzgado
  7. Primero. Penal Municipal de Cartagena, para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1998.
  8. Comuniquese, notifiquese, cumplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.