JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 26, 2007

T-569 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Fabian Alberto Gomez Cruz Vs. Cajanal

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Solicitud de sustitución pensional
Derecho De Peticion En Materia Pensional
  • Términos para resolver
  • Término para resolver sustitución pensional
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por cuanto no se ha vencido el plazo para resolver la petición sobre reconocimiento de sustitución pensional
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho de peticion de persona a quien la entidad no le ha respondido una solicitud de reconocimiento de pension de sobreviviente.solicita se ordene la respuesta de su solicitud.el derecho de peticion en materia de pensiones.

Deber de la entidad de informar en el termino de 15 dias sobre el tramite dado a los escritos relativos a sustitucion pensional y de dar respuesta de fondo en el termino de dos meses.

En el presente caso no ha transcurrido el tiempo de que dispone la entidad para la respuesta.

No hubo vulneracion al derecho de peticion.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de unica instancia del Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. del Circuito Judicial Administrativo de Bucaramanga (Santander), del veintisiete (27) de febrero de 2007, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.