JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 20, 2003

T-508 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Yaneth Mafla Mendez Vs. Colegio Instituto Eliseo Payan De Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Educacion De Menor De Edad. Solicitud De Ingreso A Clases. Mora En Pago De Pensiones. Hecho Sobreviniente Por Haber Sido Herido. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Sustraccion De Materia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto e improcedencia de confirmar sentencia contraria a la Constitución Política
Derecho A La Educacion Del Niño
  • Prohibición de retiro de clases o retención de certificado de estudios por no pago de pensión
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR, por las razones expuestas la sentencia proferida el 10 de febrero de 2003 por el Juzgado Trece Penal del Circuito de Cali.
  2. Segundo. DECLARAR que existe carencia actual de objeto por existir un hecho ya superado, por lo cual se abstiene de impartir orden alguna en relación con la petición formulada en la tutela de la referencia.
  3. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.