JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 9, 1994

T-505 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Maria Alicia Castaño

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Ders De Los Niños. Reconocimiento De Paternidad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia del Consejo de Estado de treinta y uno (31) de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994), y, en su lugar tutelar los derechos al debido proceso, al acceso a la justicia y los derechos de los ninos.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la nulidad del auto de 30 de agosto de 1993, proferido por la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Caqueta, mediante el cual se violaron los derechos que por medio de esta providencia se amparan y las demas normas a las que se hizo alusion en la parte motiva.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar a la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Caqueta, que proceda a dictar sentencia de fondo sobre la apelacion presentada por la Procuradora 13 Judicial para la Defensa de la Familia y del Menor.
  4. Cuarto. No se accede a la peticion de condenar al pago de los perjuicios, ni a la cuota alimentaria, por las razones expuestas.
  5. Quinto. Comunicar esta providencia al Tribunal Administrativo del Caqueta, para los efectos del articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCarlos Gaviria DíazDissentHernando Herrera Vergara
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.