JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 4, 1994

T-499 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Azucena Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Venta De Terrenos Que Ya Tienen Dueño. Cooperativa "colahorro". Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. 1) Confirmar las sentencias proferidas en el presente caso, la del 24 de mayo de 1994 del Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Girardot y la de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cundinamarca de 19 de julio del presente año.
  3. 2) Envíese copia de esta sentencia a la Procuraduría General de la Nación, según lo indicado en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  4. 3) Comuníquese a la petente, a las personas contra quienes se dirigió la acción, a DANCOOP, a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cundinamarca y al Defensor del Pueblo.
  5. 4)
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.