JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 24, 1997

T-460 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Olimpia El Akdi Al Halak

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Violencia Intrafamiliar. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Efectividad De La Ley 294/96. Negada. Ver Auto 003a/98
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Violencia Intrafamiliar
  • Improcedencia de tutela
  • Medida de protección
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina y del Consejo de Estado, que negaron la acción de tutela instaurada por la peticionaria.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR oficiar, incluyéndole copia de la presente sentencia, al señor Comandante de la Policía del Departamento de San Andrés Providencia y Santa Catalina, para que por el tiempo que considere prudencial se vigile al señor Ghassam Ousma El Okde, con el fin de impedir que vuelvan a ocurrir los hechos que dieron a que la demandante impetrara la aludida medida de protección, con fundamento en la ley 294 de 1996.
  3. Tercero. Líbrese por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.