JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 6, 1993

T-419 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Soc. Pinski Y Asociados

✓
Topic · hard data
Concordato Preventivo. Nulidad De La T-120 Por Desconocimiento De La Cosa Juzgada. Pinski. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE por las razones expuestas, la sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, Sala de Decisión Civil, que a su vez confirmara la decisión del Juez 24 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, que denegó la tutela pedida por la sociedad "Pinski y Asociados S.A." en contra del Superintendente de Sociedades.
  2. Segundo. Expresamente se advierte que no tiene valor cualquier actuación realizada en cumplimiento de la sentencia T-120 de marzo 29 de 1993, declarada nula y a la cual ésta reemplaza.
  3. Tercero. Comuníquese al Juez 24 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese, publíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJorge Arango Mejía
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.