JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 6, 2000

T-396 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Isaac Jimenez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Personas De La Tercera Edad. No Entrega De Ahorros Por Financiacoop. Hecho Superado. Carencia De Objeto. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Persona De La Tercera Edad
  • Recursos depositados en entidad financiera
Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
Persona De La Tercera Edad
  • Tratamiento excepcional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. LEVANTAR la suspensión de términos ordenada en el auto del 7 de marzo de 2000.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, pero únicamente en consideración a la carencia actual de objeto de la tutela.
  3. Tercero. ENCOMIENDASE al Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, Sala Civil, verificar que los dineros consignados por FINANCOOP en el Banco Agrario y puestos a disposición de dicho Tribunal, sean efectivamente entregados a Isaac Jiménez.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.