JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 13, 1996

T-356 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Luis Alfredo Ramirez Sarmiento

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Retiro Voluntario De La Policia Nal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Retiro voluntario de la policía
  • Obligación de comunicar trámite
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la providencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala Penal, de fecha quince (15) de marzo de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996). En consecuencia, tutelar el derecho de petición del Capitán Luis Alfredo Ramírez Sarmiento.
  2. Segundo. La Dirección General de la Policía, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, después de ser notificada esta sentencia, deberá informarle al demandante que su solicitud de retiro se resolverá dentro de un plazo razonable, de acuerdo con las circunstancias de seguridad nacional o especiales de servicio.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta decisión al Juzgado 55 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá, para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.