JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 13, 1999

T-345 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Martha Bedoya De Cruz

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A La Vida Y A La Seguridad Social. Solicitud De Pension De Sobreviviente Al I.S.S. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bono Pensional
  • Certificación sobre monto de cotizaciones realizadas por empleador
  • Procedencia de tutela para reclamar la remisión
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Dieciséis Penal Municipal de Medellín. En consecuencia conceder la tutela al derecho a la vida y seguridad social de la señora Martha Bedoya de Cruz.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al ISS, que si aún no lo ha hecho, en el lapso perentorio de quince días, contados a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, certifique con destino a las empresas públicas de Medellín, el monto de las cotizaciones realizadas por el empleador del señor Alfredo de Jesús Cruz Sepúlveda al ISS.
  3. Tercero. ADVERTIR al ISS, que una vez cuente con el bono pensional, continúe con los trámites necesarios para el reconocimiento de la pensión al demandante.
  4. Cuarto. LÍBRENSE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 , para los efectos allí previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.