JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 1, 1994

T-301 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Jose Peregrino Mendivelso

✓
Topic · hard data
Ocupacion Temporal De La Propiedad Inmueble Por Parte De Las Fuerzas Militares. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas, la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Socotá, el día 8 de Febrero de 1994, por medio de la cual se negó la solicitud de tutela instaurada por el señor JOSE PEREGRINO MENDIVELSO.
  4. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR, que por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, se efectúen las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.