JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 15, 2001

T-290 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Elizabeth Mosquera Mena Y Otros Vs. Municipio De Quibdo

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Trabajo Y Peticion. Reconocimiento Incremento Salarial Del Año 1997 E Indexacion Para Empleados Y Extrabajadores. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Improcedencia incremento salarial para servidores públicos
Juez Constitucional
  • Improcedencia para sustituir a las autoridades en las competencias asignadas por la Constitución Política
Juez De Tutela
  • Imposibilidad de modificar presupuesto para incremento salarial de servidores públicos
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. Revocar la decisión adoptada por el Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Quibdó, en sentencia del 25 de julio de 2000 y, en su lugar, confirmar la decisión del 9 de mayo de 2000, adoptada por el Juzgado
  4. Primero. Civil Municipal de Quibdó, en cuanto denegó la tutela interpuesta por los accionantes mencionados en los antecedentes de esta providencia.
  5. Segundo. Por Secretaria, LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.