JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 17, 1994

T-238 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Mario Hoyos Estrada

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Falta De Notificacion. Nulidad. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el dos (2) de diciembre de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993) por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil, el cual, a su vez, confirmó la sentencia dictada por la Sala Civil del Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, el diecinueve (19) de mayo del mismo año.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR esta providencia al Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.