JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 22, 2001

T-217 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Ruth Cecilia Garcia De Barrera Vs. Procuraduria General De La Nacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Buen Nombre Honra Y Debido Proceso. Practica De Pruebas En Proceso Disciplinario. Destitucion E Inhabilidad Para Ejercer Cargos Publicos. Necesidad De Informacion Suficiente Y Precisa Sobre Los Hechos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Para Reintegro Al Cargo
  • Improcedencia por existir otro medio de defensa judicial y no existir perjuicio irremediable
Acción De Tutela
  • Inmediatez
  • Trámite oportuno y ágil
Juez De Tutela
  • Necesidad de información suficiente sobre los hechos
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones aquí señaladas, el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Orito del 2 de agosto de 2000, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela incoada por Ruth Cecilia García de Barrera contra la Procuraduría General de la Nación, que negó la protección solicitada.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.