JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 19, 2002

T-208 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Mary Quintero Ramirez Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Silencio Administrativo Negativo. Acceso A La Administracion De Justicia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar el fallo proferido por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia dentro del proceso de la referencia, y en su lugar conceder la tutela a Mary Quintero Ramirez por violacion del derecho de peticion, instaurada en contra del Instituto de Seguros Sociales.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar al Instituto de Seguros Sociales que, si aun no lo ha hecho, resuelva de fondo e integramente el recurso interpuesto por Mary Quintero Ramirez contra la Resolucion Ndeg 0120099 del 2000, por medio del cual se le reconocio su pension de vejez, en un termino que no podra exceder las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo.
  3. Tercero. Librar, por medio de la Secretaria General, las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991. Adicionalmente comunicar el fallo a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.