JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 28, 2000

T-201 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Guillermo Molina Roa

✓
Topic · hard data
Contrato De Concesion Para La Prestacion Del Servicio De Alumbrado Publico Para Cartagena. Acuerdo Invalidado Por Tribunal Administrativo De Bolivar. Se Pueden Utilizar Otros Medios Judiciales Diferentes A La Accion De Tutela. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acuerdo De Concejo Municipal
  • Remisión al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo cuando Gobernador lo considere contrario a la Constitución
Acto Administrativo De Concejo Municipal
  • Control de constitucionalidad y legalidad sobre validez
Acuerdo De Concejo Distrital
  • Invalidez por Tribunal Administrativo
Debido Proceso En Control Sobre Acuerdo De Concejo Distrital
  • Inexistencia de vulneración por no intervención en el trámite de las objeciones u observaciones del Gobernador
Gobernador
  • Objeciones u observaciones a Acuerdo por inconstitucionalidad
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Declaración de nulidad del contrato para lograr protección de derechos
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el ordinal
  2. primero. del fallo del 5 de octubre de 1999, emitido por el Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Cartagena de Indias, y REVOCAR los ordinales
  4. segundo. y
  5. tercero.
  6. Segundo. Por Secretaria librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.