T-192 de 1999
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Jose Edisson Muñoz Silva
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inexistencia de vulneración por no práctica de prueba testimonial ante no comparecencia
- Práctica de la integridad de pruebas solicitadas y decretadas por el juez
- Práctica de prueba testimonial que se considera de vital importancia
- Alcance restrictivo
- Improcedencia por existencia de mecanismo de defensa judicial
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMASE la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Cuarenta y Nueve Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, que consideró improcedente la acción de tutela, pero por las razones consignadas en la presente providencia.
- Segundo. LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.