JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 14, 2002

T-189 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Nohora Cecilia Lopera Peña Vs. Coomeva Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Menor De Edad. Solicitud Practica Cirugia Plastica Y Suministro Tratamiento Posterior. Entidad Encargada Para Autorizar Procedimiento Quirurgico No Incluido En El Pos. Debida Orientacion A Usuarios. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Menor
  • Cirugía excluida del POS y trámite debe dirigirse a Dirección de salud que corresponde
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el diecinueve (19) de noviembre de dos mil uno (2001), por el Juzgado 1 Civil del Circuito de Medellin, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Nohora Lopera Pena en representacion del menor Wilver Nicolas Tamayo Lopera contra la E.P.S. Coomeva Seccional Medellin.
  2. Segundo. Se PREVIENE a la E.P.S. Coomeva Seccional Medellin, para que oriente a los usuarios, sobre las entidades a las cuales deben acudir a solicitar los procedimientos medicos y quirurgicos excluidos del Plan Obligatorio de Salud.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.