T-176 de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Ivonne Esther Solano Santiago Vs. Alcaldia Municipal De Baraona Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por no afectación del mínimo vital
- Término de presentación
- Improcedencia pago de salarios por inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
- Inmediatez
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo de instancia proferido por la Sala Tercera Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, mediante el cual se Denegó por improcedente la acción de tutela, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
- Segundo. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.