JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 23, 2000

T-1630 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Maria Nury Medina Quintin Vs. Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta De Ibague

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Prueba De Veracidad De Los Hechos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • Determinación veracidad de hechos a través de pruebas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar, por las razones expuestas, el fallo proferido por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, el 22 de junio de 2000, mediante el cual se negó la tutela solicitada por la señora María Nury Medina Quintin contra el Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta de la Ciudad de Ibagué.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.