T-149 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Dora Lilia Parra Valencia Vs Comparta Ars
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Carencia actual de objeto
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Derecho a la salud de afiliada al regimen subsidiado que fue remitida por la entidad para un tratamiento a otro municipio en dondde contara con el nivel de atencion pero la entidad no suministra los recursos para la movilizacion.
La entidad restablecio el servicio requerido por la accionante en el municipio de residencia de esta.
Carencia actual de objeto
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Nuquí (Chocó) el 19 de septiembre de 2005, que negó la tutela interpuesta por Dora Lilia Parra Valencia contra Comparta A.R.S, exclusivamente por carencia actual de objeto.
- Segundo. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.