JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 2, 2000

T-1486 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Stella Gomez Pardo Y Otras Vs. Departamento De Cundinamarca Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad. Personas De La Tercera Edad. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago De La Pension Gracia De Docentes. Reajuste Pensional. Cajanal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Incremento pensional
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Alcance
  • Supuestos de hecho iguales, deben recibir el mismo tratamiento jurídico
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCASE por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 18 Penal del Circuito de Bogota, en julio once (11) del ano 2000, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por medio de apoderado por las senoras Stella Gomez Pardo, Maria Dolores Parra de Diaz, Fanny Betancourt de Grisales y Virginia Diaz Perez, en contra del Departamento de Cundinamarca y el Fondo de Pensiones Publicas de Cundinamarca. En su lugar DENIEGASE el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.