JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 27, 1995

T-135 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Nohemi Villaveces De Acosta

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Reliquidacion Y Pago De Prestaciones. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE la Sentencia proferida el 21 de octubre de 1991 por la Sala de Decisión Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Fe de Bogotá, que a su vez confirmó la dictada por el Juzgado 26 Penal del Circuito de la misma ciudad, por medio de la cual se negó el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.