JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 16, 1994

T-128 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Gloria Perez Rodriguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Ders. De Los Niños. Maltratos. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada. Pero Es Procedente La Proteccion Inmediata Del I.C.B.F.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado 21 de Familia de Santafé de Bogotá, de 11 de junio de 1993, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia. En consecuencia, no se concede la tutela demandada por la señora GLORIA PEREZ RODRIGUEZ, en representación de sus hijas.
  2. SEGUNDO. SOLICITAR al Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar continuar el seguimiento de la situación de las niñas, de conformidad con su competencia. Sobre su actuación, el Instituto informará al Juzgado 21 de Familia de esta ciudad.
  3. TERCERO. Advertir al señor CESAR OSWALDO GRANDA REINOSO que debe abstenerse de incurrir en cualquier conducta en perjuicio de sus hijas menores.
  4. CUARTO. Comunicar la presente sentencia al Juzgado 21 de Familia de esta ciudad, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.