T-1129 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Adriana Rojas Ortiz Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia incremento salarial para servidores públicos
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (88 points)
- Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos que a continuacion se detallan, que negaron las tutelas de la referencia:
- Expediente:
- Procedencia del fallo:
- T-309161
- Tribunal contencioso administrativo de Cundinamarca, seccion cuarta
- T-309281
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309282
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309283
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309284
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309285
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309286
- Consejo seccional de la judicatura de Sucre, sala jurisdiccional disciplinaria
- T-309396
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309398
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309399
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309401
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309402
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309403
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309418
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309420
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-309461
- Bogota, Tribunal administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion 2, subseccion a.
- T-309506
- Armenia, tribunal superior, sala laboral.
- T-309597
- Tunja, tribunal superior, sala civil - familia
- T- 309599
- Tunja, tribunal superior, sala civil familia
- T-309645
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-309646
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-309647
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-309648
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-310121
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-310122
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-310128
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-310129
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T- 310130
- Tunja, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil-familia
- T-310148
- Tunja, tribunal superior, sala civil familia
- T-310149
- Tunja, tribunal superior, sala civil familia
- T-310204
- Bogota, juzgado 30 civil municipal
- T-310254
- Bogota, juzgado 9 de familia
- T-310259
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior sala civil
- T-310260
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior sala civil
- T-310293
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior sala civil
- T-310456
- Bogota, tribunal superior, sala laboral
- T-310639
- Bogota, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-310663
- Bogota, juzgado 53 civil municipal
- T-310816
- Tribunal administrativo de Cundinamarca, seccion tercera
- T-310819
- Tribunal administrativo de Cundinamarca, seccion tercera
- T-310848
- Bucaramanga, tribunal superior del distrito judicial, sala civil
- T-309252
- Consejo de Estado, sala de lo contencioso administrativo, seccion primera
- Segundo. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.