JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 31, 2008

T-1077 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Pedro Emilio Abalo·Respondent Instituto De Seguros Sociales

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por reconocimiento de pensión
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Debido proceso y mínimo vital ya que se le negó el reconocimiento de su pensión de vejez con el argumento de que no tenía el número mínimo de semanas cotizadas al sistema general de pensiones.

Manifiesta que es beneficiario del régimen de transición y cumplía los requisitos exigidos por el decreto 758 de 1990.

A la fecha la pensión solicitada ya le fue reconocida por lo que habrá de declararse la carencia actual de objeto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado Decimotercero Penal del Circuito de Medellín que se revisa, en cuanto denegó la acción de tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la carencia actual de objeto.
  3. Tercero. LIBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.