JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 2, 2002

T-1058 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Cecilia Villamizar De Pacheco Vs. Registrador Del Estado Civil De Pamplona

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De Peticion Igualdad Y A Elegir Y Ser Elegido. Demora Expedicion Cedula De Ciudadania. Tramites Y Procedimientos Para La Entrega. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Hecho Superado. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por entrega de cédula de ciudadanía
Derechos Fundamentales
  • Vulneración por mora en expedición de cédula
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas, tanto por la Sala Civil - Familia - Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Pamplona como por la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en el trámite de la acción de tutela instaurada por Cecilia Villamizar de Pacheco contra el Registrador del Estado Civil de Pamplona.
  2. Segundo. Por tratarse de un hecho superado no se darán órdenes sobre el particular.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.