JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 26, 1993

T-078 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein

✓Claimant Daniell Anaya C. Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Posesion. Playas De Bocatocino. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la decisión proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla del 18 de agosto de 1992, en el sentido de denegar la acción de tutela impetrada por el señor DANIEL ANAYA CARRILLO y ANTONIO MOLINARES.
  5. SEGUNDO. Líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.