JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 8, 1999

T-063 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Hugo Alfonso Montoya Suarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Atencion Medica Y Alimentacion Adecuada En La Carcel. Tutela Temeraria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Temeraria
  • Traslado a la Fiscalía por la posible comisión de un hecho punible
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia de segunda instancia, proferida el 26 de agosto de 1998 por el Juzgado Penal del Circuito de Puerto Berrio, la cual decidio confirmar la decision de primera instancia que denego la solicitud de tutela presentada por Hugo Alfonso Montoya Suarez en contra del director de la Carcel de Puerto Berrio y del Comite Disciplinario del mismo centro de reclusion, pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. por Secretaria General, COMPULSENSE copias del expediente a la Fiscalia Regional de Antioquia para que, en los terminos de esta providencia, se sirva investigar la conducta asumida por el peticionario, Hugo Alfonso Montoya Suarez.
  5. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.