JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 2, 1994

T-031 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Julio Enrique Torres

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud. Lesion En La Columna. Servicio Militar Obligatorio. Minoria De Edad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 36 Penal Municipal de Cali, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. DENEGAR la tutela solicitada por el senor Julio Enrique Torres Bustamante, en representacion de su hijo Julian Humberto Torres Salazar, por la vulneracion de los derechos de los ninos y el derecho a la salud, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  3. TERCERO. Como consecuencia del numeral anterior, el joven Julian Humberto Torres Salazar debe reintegrarse al Batallon de Policia Militar No. 3, en el cual se encontraba en el momento del cumplimiento del fallo que le concedia la tutela, para de esta forma prestar su servicio militar obligatorio, teniendo en cuenta sus aptitudes fisicas y psicologicas.
  4. CUARTO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 36 Penal Municipal de Cali, al Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, al Batallon de Policia Militar No. 3, al Batallon de Policia Militar No. 13, al Defensor del Pueblo y al peticionario de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available4
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroDissentFabio Morón DíazDissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.