JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 9, 1999Full bench

C-993 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jairo Villegas Arbelaez

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. Ley 1122/99 Art 160161162 Parc. 163164 Y 165. Funcion Publica Notarial Ver <a Href=../1999/C-702-99y.Rtf> C-702/99</A><a Href=../1999/C-903-99.Rtf> C-903/99</A>. Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1122/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 160Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 161Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 162Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 163Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 164Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 165Decreto 1122/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-923 de 1999, que declaró la inexequibilidad del Decreto 1122 de 1999, a partir de la fecha de su promulgación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes MuñozConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.