JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 26, 2005Full bench

C-984 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jose Manuel Diaz Soto

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Fiscalia General De La Nacion. Establecimiento De Directrices Para El Funcionamiento De Los Mecanismos De Justicia Restaurativa
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Oportunidad
  • Control del juez de garantías
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 906 de 2004 articulo 327 (parcial).

Se expide el codigo de procedimiento penal.

Control judicial en la aplicación del principio de oportunidad.

Cosa juzgada.

Mediante sentencia <a href=../2005/c-979-05se.rtf> c-979/05</a>declaro la inexequibilidad de la expresion "siempre que con esta se extinga la accion penal" contenida en el articulo 327 de la ley 2004.

Habiendo operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estarse a lo resuelto en c-979-05

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 906/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 327Ley 906/04ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-979 de 2005, en la cual se declaro inexequible la expresion "siempre que con esta se extinga la accion penal" contenida en el articulo 327 de la Ley 906 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.