JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 29, 2004Full bench

C-933 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Francisco Edilberto Mora Quiñones

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma Del Codigo Civil
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Requisitos mínimos
  • Formulación de un razonamiento mínimo demostrativo del cargo
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Incumplimiento de presentación de un razonamiento mínimo demostrativo del cargo
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo civil arts. 2513 y 2536.

Codigo de procedimiento civil art. 306.

Prescripción extintintiva y adquisitiva.

Prescripción de accion ejecutiva.

Accion de inconstitucionalidad de carácter publico e informal pero ello no es obice para que al demandante

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 84/73DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2536Ley 84/73DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2513Ley 57/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2536Ley 57/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 306Decreto 1400/70DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2513Ley 791/02DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2536Ley 791/02DECLINED TO RULE
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para conocer de los apartes acusados de los articulos 2513 y 2536 del Codigo Civil, modificados por los articulos 2 y 8 de la Ley 791 de 2002, y de los apartes acusados del articulo 306 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.