JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 14, 2004Full bench

C-889 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Andres De Zubiría Samper

✓
Topic · hard data
Proyecto De Ley Aprobado. Sanción U Objeción Por El Gobierno
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Desviacion De Poder En Tramite Legislativo
  • Prohibición constitucional expresa de acudir a ciertas prácticas
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Acusación impertinente al no deducirse un reproche constitucional
  • Falta de sustento de aseveración que permita comprobar veracidad y relevancia constitucional
Informe De La Comision De Conciliacion
  • Control oficioso de la Corte Constitucional sobre publicación previa
Proyecto De Ley Aprobado
  • Sanción u objeción por el Gobierno
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 863 de 2003.

Por la cual se establecen normas tributarias aduaneras fiscales y de control para estimular el crecimiento economico y el saneamiento de las finanzas públicas.

Inhibición para pronunciarse sobre la acusación acerca de la violación del principio de separacion de poderes

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 863/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 863 de 2003, en relacion con el cargo acerca de que en su tramite se vulnero lo establecido por el articulo 165 de la Constitucion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.