JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 7, 2004Full bench

C-867 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Ruben Sabogal Barrios

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Facultades Extraordinarias Respecto De Escisión Del Instituto De Seguros Sociales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Facultades extraordinarias respecto de escisión del Instituto de Seguros Sociales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1750 de 2003 art. 1.

Escinde el instituto de seguros sociales y se crean una empresas sociales del estado.

Escisión de la vicepresidencia de servicios de salud todas las clinicas y todos los centros de atencion ambulatoria.

Cosa juzgada constitucional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1750/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1750/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-349 de 2004, en relacion con la exequibilidad del articulo 1o del Decreto 1750 de 2003.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy CabraConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.