JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 3, 2002Full bench

C-811 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Edilberto Escobar Cortes

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Prohibición A Entidades Territoriales De Gravar Explotación De Recursos Naturales No Renovables
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Prohibición a entidades territoriales de gravar explotación de recursos naturales no renovables
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 141 de 1994.

Art. 27.

Fondo nacional de regalias.

Comision nacional.

Derecho del estado a recibir por la explortacion de los recursos naturales no renovables.

Liquidacion y distribucion.

Prohibicion a entidades territoriales para establecer gravamenes.

Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-567/95

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 141/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 27Ley 141/94ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-567 de 1995, en la que se declaro la exequibilidad del articulo 27 de la Ley 141 de 1994.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.