JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 3, 2002Full bench

C-713 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Marcela Patricia Jimenez Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad Provisional Ante Detencion Preventiva. Tope A Caución Prendaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Por Omision Legislativa
  • Formulación directa contra norma de cuyo texto surge
Libertad Provisional Ante Detencion Preventiva
  • Distinción entre pago de multa y caución prendaria
  • Tope a caución prendaria
  • Finalidad de la caución prendaria
Cosa Juzgada Relativa
  • Momento de la libertad bajo caución
Proceso Penal
  • Finalidad de la caución prendaria
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 600 de 2000.

Art. 366 .

Codigo de procedimiento penal.

Beneficio de libertad provisional.

Caucion prendaria.

Detencion preventiva.

Cosa juzgada relativa.

Omision legislativa.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 326Ley 600/00UPHELD
Art. 366Ley 600/00UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase EXEQUIBLE la expresión "prendaria" contenida en el artículo 366 de la ley 600 de 2000 por los cargos presentados y conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.